刑法第306条存与废:倾听法律职业人的声音

Abstract

刑法第306条(又称律师伪证罪)从其诞生之日起就面临着当存还是当废的巨大争议,这些争议或来自学理或来自实践中的相关利益群体。2009年底至2010年初的李庄案再次使得这一争论从幕后转至台前。通过考察法律职业人对第306条的真实态度,可以深入地发掘争议背后的社会因素:即司法机关观念上的误区;诉讼结构的不合理;追诉程序上的瑕疵,从而从实体和程序上为刑法第306条的未来寻求一条理性的出路———存而慎用。

Penal Code 306 has been faced with controversy which should be remained or be repealed all the times from its birth which is from theories or interests groups in practice.This controversy is made from backstage to stage because of case of Li Zhuang which happened from late 2009 to early 2010.We can deeply explore the social factors behind the controversy : misunderstanding of judicial organization;unreasonable of criminal structure;and defect of prosecution procedure through investigating the legal professional persons' attitude to Penal Code 306 to find a reasonable way for the Penal Code 306' s future——remained and applied cautiously.