解析不动产登记错误赔偿责任的性质

Abstract

《物权法》确立了不动产登记错误的赔偿责任,但因过于简化,没有明确赔偿责任的性质。笔者在解析《物权法》第21条的具体内容后认为,《物权法》规制的赔偿责任性质是:不全是国家赔偿责任,也不全是民事赔偿责任。由于一直以来,对这两种赔偿责任的态度均是立法上二者只居其一,适用上是相互排斥的,为此,笔者进一步对《物权法》的如此规制进行了正当性论证。

The "Property Law" identifies the responsibility on compensating for the mis-registration of real estate.But it is simplified too much so that the nature of compensating responsibility is not specified therein.The author made an all-around analysis on the contents in Article 21,the "Property Law" and concluded that:the nature of responsibility on compensating for mis-registration,as regulated in the "Property Law",is neither the responsibility of national compensation nor that of civil compensation in total.At all times,people always regard these two kinds of compensating responsibilities as legislatively one-based and applicably mutually-exclusive.For this reason,the author argued towards the legitimacy of the nature of responsibility on compensating for mis-registration as regulated in the "Property Law".