Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSui, Cheng-Junzh_CN
dc.contributor.authorLi, Binzh_CN
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jia-Meizh_CN
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuang-Jiazh_CN
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Yan-Mingzh_CN
dc.contributor.author李滨zh_CN
dc.contributor.author周彦明zh_CN
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T07:36:48Z
dc.date.available2015-07-22T07:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2012-01zh_CN
dc.identifier.citationASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012,35(1):1-8zh_CN
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000306581200001zh_CN
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/93338
dc.description.abstractObjective: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a minimally invasive surgical technique. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the currently available literature and compare the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent LDP for left-sided pancreatic pathology with patients who underwent traditional open surgery. Methods: A literature search was performed to identify and compare studies that reported the clinical outcomes of both LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) were calculated using either fixed-effects or random-effects models. Results: Nineteen nonrandomized controlled studies were identified that matched the selection criteria and reported the clinical outcomes of 1935 patients, of whom 805 underwent LDP and 1130 underwent ODP. Compared with open surgery, reports on laparoscopic resection indicate potentially favorable outcomes in terms of operative blood loss (WMD: -273.11; 95% CI: -404.61 to -141.61), the requirement of a blood transfusion (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11 -0.71), postoperative time until oral intake (WMD: -1.19; 95% CI: -1.87 to -0.50), time to first flatus (WMD: -1.03, 95% CI: -1.93 to -0.12), length of hospital stay (WMD: -3.87, 95% CI: -5.06 to -2.68), and overall morbidity (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.87). There were no differences in terms of the extent of oncologic clearance and postoperative mortality. Conclusion: LDP results in a faster postoperative recovery and a comparable oncologic clearance in comparison with open surgery. Additional large trials are required to delineate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms who undergo either of these two surgeries. Copyright (C) 2012, Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.zh_CN
dc.language.isoen_USzh_CN
dc.publisherASIAN J SURGzh_CN
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.04.001zh_CN
dc.subjectSINGLE-INSTITUTIONzh_CN
dc.subjectCLINICAL-OUTCOMESzh_CN
dc.subjectRESECTIONzh_CN
dc.subjectPANCREASzh_CN
dc.subjectSURGERYzh_CN
dc.subjectBENIGNzh_CN
dc.subjectINSULINOMASzh_CN
dc.subjectEXPERIENCEzh_CN
dc.subjectDISEASEzh_CN
dc.subjectSPLEENzh_CN
dc.titleLaparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: A meta-analysiszh_CN
dc.typeArticlezh_CN


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record