Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJi, Guojunzh_CN
dc.contributor.authorGunasekaran, Angappazh_CN
dc.contributor.authorYang, Guangyongzh_CN
dc.contributor.author计国君zh_CN
dc.contributor.author杨光勇zh_CN
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T03:08:11Z
dc.date.available2015-07-22T03:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2014 JANzh_CN
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014,147:211-219zh_CN
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000329880300003zh_CN
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/87682
dc.descriptionNatural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71201138]; Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China [12YJC630264]; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province, China [2012J01304]zh_CN
dc.description.abstractWith increasing pollution of ecological environment and global warming, more and more countries and governments have enacted double environmental medium (DEM) regulations (i.e., regulations focused on greenhouse gas emission and regulations focused on waste disposal) to curb environmental impact. Based on the triple bottom line principles and DEM regulations, this paper clarifies environmental bottom line into ecological impact and carbon emission bottom lines, the former one of which is contingent on ecological footprint, while the latter one depends on carbon footprint. According to supply chain structure and product life cycle, we analyze environmental impact (i.e., ecological and carbon impact) reduction strategies simultaneously in production, distribution, use and disposal phases as well. Our conclusions show that for production phase, ecological footprint reduction need to remove toxic substances, and carbon footprint could be reduced by improving demand forecast accuracy and investment in carbon reduction technology; For distribution phase, carbon footprint could be mitigated by using smaller packaging and joint distribution, allying with third party logistics providers and adopting cross-docking network; For use phase, carbon footprint could be abated by improving energy efficiency and shortening using time, in some cases, however, shortening using time can increase ecological footprint. For disposal phase, combination of between design for ecology and comprehensive take-back (return) networks could decrease ecological impacts efficiently. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.zh_CN
dc.language.isoen_USzh_CN
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVzh_CN
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.012zh_CN
dc.subjectPRODUCTzh_CN
dc.subjectPERFORMANCEzh_CN
dc.subjectMANAGEMENTzh_CN
dc.subjectEMISSIONSzh_CN
dc.subjectINVESTMENTSzh_CN
dc.subjectINDUSTRIESzh_CN
dc.subjectSTRATEGIESzh_CN
dc.subjectDESIGNzh_CN
dc.subjectWASTEzh_CN
dc.subjectGASzh_CN
dc.titleConstructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulationszh_CN
dc.typeArticlezh_CN


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record