Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBai, Peiwenzh_CN
dc.contributor.author柏培文zh_CN
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T02:06:22Z
dc.date.available2015-07-22T02:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2011zh_CN
dc.identifier.citationADVANCED RESEARCH ON INDUSTRY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-7, 2011,204-210:1910-1914zh_CN
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000292846401064zh_CN
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/85597
dc.descriptionConference Name:International Conference on Industry, Information System and Material Engineering. Conference Address: Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA. Time:APR 16-17, 2011.zh_CN
dc.description.abstractThis article analyzes how the choice of governance model affects income ratio of between the capital and labor groups and future development in a society. Governance models might be divided into anarchy, regulatory government, centralized government and elected government. The income ratios of between the capital and labor groups and social sustainable developments in four governance models are shown by a basic model. Both anarchy and regulatory government would be unsustainable early or late, centralized government would be uncertain in sustainable development, while elected government would be durative because of equality. Therefore, a governance model should be designed as elected government or centralized government in a society, and if centralized government is chosen, it is necessary to keep it sustainable for us.zh_CN
dc.language.isoen_USzh_CN
dc.publisherADV MATER RES-SWITZzh_CN
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.204-210.1910zh_CN
dc.titleGovernance Models, Income Distribution and Sustainable Developmentzh_CN
dc.typeConferencezh_CN


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record