过失犯的结果归责研究
Research on the Results Imputation of Negligent Crime
Abstract
在过失犯罪的领域中，行为人预见到其行为可能造成法益侵害的结果，并且违反了社会生活要求的避险规则，从而实现法益侵害。但是，就当时的情况看，即使行为人审慎地履行注意义务，法益侵害的结果仍然难以避免。此时，结果是否可以归责于行为人？在司法实践中通常的结论有：一、按照不可抗力处理，行为人无罪。二、按照过失犯罪处理，行为人有罪。案情类似，裁判结论却迥然不同，即使结论相同，裁判理由亦没有统一的思路和标准，丧失了刑法的公正性和均衡性。笔者认为，探讨过失犯的结果归责，不仅只是纯粹理论上的思辨，更有实际操作上的意义，亦能为推动刑法过失犯理论的精细化和深入化提供一个契机。 本文通过考察德国、日本及我国台湾地区个... In the extent of negligent crime, the perpetrator foresee his behavior may cause a result which can damage legal interest,and he infringes the safety rules that social life requires, thus damage the legal interest. However, the consequence still occurs even if he performed his duties well under certain circumstances. On this occasion , whether the result can be attributed to the perpetrator? There...