Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor齐树洁
dc.contributor.author李雪松
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-13T02:47:43Z
dc.date.available2016-01-13T02:47:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-16 08:58:44.0
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/75325
dc.description.abstract在当前中国社会矛盾高发的转型社会里,法院调解得以强势回归。最高人民法院提出了“调解优先”的司法政策,2012年新修改的《民事诉讼法》确认了这一点。但在理论界,对“调解优先”的质疑之声极高,认为强化调解有违法治精神。司法实践中,法院调解的运行出现了极端化的倾向,由此也带来了一些负面问题。从现有的有关调解的研究成果来看,大多限于对调解的功能主义分析,或者将其作为一种社会现象予以描述,这无助于调解问题的改进。如何从法治的角度来认识和处理法院调解,便成为理论界无法回避的焦点问题。基于此,本文从法治的角度出发,正面阐释调解与法治的关系,并以调判关系为核心,进一步研究在我国法治化进程中法院调解应如何运行的...
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, judicial mediation has got a strong recursion in China. The Supreme People’s Court put forward the judicial policy of “mediation preference”, which was confirmed by the revised Civil Procedure Law in 2012. However, many scholars are questioning the justification of “mediation preference” and consider it to be a serious violation of spirits of rule of law. Extreme exercises of judi...
dc.language.isozh_CN
dc.relation.urihttps://catalog.xmu.edu.cn/opac/openlink.php?strText=37662&doctype=ALL&strSearchType=callno
dc.source.urihttps://etd.xmu.edu.cn/detail.asp?serial=41719
dc.subject调解优先
dc.subject法治理论
dc.subject调审关系
dc.subjectMediation Preference
dc.subjectTheories of Rule of Law
dc.subjectRelation between Mediation and Judgment
dc.title法治进程中的法院调解研究——以调判关系为中心
dc.title.alternativeStudy on Court Mediation in the Process of Chinese Legalization_Focus on the Relation between Mediation and Judgment
dc.typethesis
dc.date.replied2013-05-26
dc.description.note学位:法律硕士
dc.description.note院系专业:法学院_法律硕士(JM)
dc.description.note学号:X2009120063


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record