• 中文
    • English
  • English 
    • 中文
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • 人文学院
  • 人文学院-工作文稿
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • 人文学院
  • 人文学院-工作文稿
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

如淳“更三品”说驳议
A Refutation to “Three Kinds of Gengs” by Ruchun

Thumbnail
Full Text
如淳“更三品”说驳议.pdf (837.7Kb)
Date
2007
Author
耿虎
GENG Hu
杨际平
YANG Ji-ping
Collections
  • 杨际平 [64]
  • 人文学院-工作文稿 [56]
Show full item record
Abstract
【中文摘要】如淳“更三品”说对汉代力役制度作了注释。由于他在分类上将属概念(卒更)与种概念(践更、过更)对等并列,在概念使用上将纳更赋者视为践更,同时又将所谓“戍边三日”的代役钱视为过更,从而造成很大混乱。如淳所谓的“戍边三日”之制既无理论上的合理性也无实践中的可操作性,从传世文献与出土资料看,它其实是不存在的。如淳所谓的“天下人皆直戍边三日”、“虽丞相子亦在戍边之调”,也与汉代复除制度不合。汉代不存在虽丞相子也要承担之役。 【Abstract】:“ Three kinds of gengs” by Ruchun has expounded the corvée system of the Han dynasty.But there is a mistake because he puts the category geng man and the species jiangeng and guogeng on the same level, and treats the people paying the money for geng as a kind of jiangeng , and“ guarding the frontier three days” and the money paid for corvée as a kindof guogeng.Actually, the system of“ guarding the frontier three days” is neither reasonable theoretically or operational in practice.Furthermore, it is impossible according to the information discovered.The opinion that“everyone must guard the frontier three days” and “even the son of the prime minister should guard the frontier” is not consistent with the fuchu system of the time.There is no corvée that the son of a prime minister must take in the Han Dynasty.
Description
耿虎,厦门大学海外教育学院华文系副教授,历史学博士;杨际平,厦门大学人文学院历史系教授、博士生导师。
Citation
厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,181(3):92-100
URI
https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/5963

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies