• 中文
    • English
  • English 
    • 中文
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • 法学院
  • 法学院-学位论文
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • 法学院
  • 法学院-学位论文
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

英美刑事非法证据排除规则比较研究
Comparison and Reference of the Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Criminal Litigation between the Britain and the United States

Thumbnail
Full Text
英美刑事非法证据排除规则比较研究.pdf (433.9Kb)
Date
2012-09-25
Author
任才峰
Collections
  • 法学院-学位论文 [5538]
Show full item record
Abstract
英美两国同属普通法系,美国法律制度作为普通法系这棵大树上的一根主枝,在吮吸着普通法的精华的同时,在众多方面发生了变异。美国人继承并发展了普通法,但并未全盘认同英国人的法律观。在刑事非法证据排除领域,英美两国对待刑事非法证据的基本立场存在较大差异。概言之,在刑事诉讼中,英国以采纳非法证据为原则,以排除非法证据为例外,是否排除由法官自由裁量;而美国则适用相对严格的排除法则。但美国自20世纪70年代以来逐步缩小非法证据排除规则的适用范围,在立场上与英国逐步趋同。英美两国对非法证据的不同处理存在多种原因,包括在宪政传统、遵循先例、政治架构、警察体制、民众对行政执法官的态度以及美国首席大法官的政治倾向等...
 
The United States and the Britain belong to the same Common-Law System, the legal system of the United States, as an important part of the Common-Law System, has changed in various areas while absorbing the marrow of the Common-Law System. The United States has not identified with the Britain on many subjects of the Common-Law System. Take the rule of the illegally obtained evidence in criminal li...
 
URI
https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/22298

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies