网络服务提供者刑事责任的限制
The Limit of Internet Service Provider’s Criminal Responsibility
Abstract
迅速发展的网络技术在促进社会发展的同时，由于其特性对传统刑法理论和刑事司法造成重大挑战，我国刑事立法、司法积极应对网络犯罪问题，针对网络服务提供者形成了共犯责任、正犯责任和不作为责任的刑事责任体系，积极扩大网络服务提供者的入罪空间。但笔者基于网络服务提供者服务行为的中立性，认为当前相关罪名之入罪门槛过低。 针对中立帮助行为，刑法理论通说观点是限制处罚说，包括主观说、客观说和折衷说，各学说内部观点林立，如促进意图、社会相当性、客观归责论等。笔者认为网络服务提供者承担刑事责任的前提是有无防止他人利用自己中立行为实施犯罪的审查注意义务；若有，结果是否有回避可能性以及运用客观归责论判断中立帮助行为与... The development of Internet brings convenience for the society. At the same time, due to its particularity, it causes serious impact on Criminal Law theory and justice. Our Criminal Legislation and Justic respond actively to this situation. Since the Amendment IX to the Criminal Law, the criminal responsibility system of the Internet Service Provider has three modes, including the responsibility o...