试析当代文艺理论界对于艺术定义的争论
A brief analysis of the debate on the art def＇mition in contemporary aesthetic world
| dc.contributor.author | 张文杰 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-26T08:09:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-26T08:09:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 镇江高专学报,2017,(3) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1008-8148 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8148.2017.03.008 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/164631 | |
| dc.description.abstract | 20世纪不断涌现的先锋艺术给艺术定义提出难题，形成了西方美学界文艺理论界旷日持久的争论，系统考察有关艺术定义的理论有其必要性。比较研究韦兹的“家族相似”理论、丹托的“艺术界”理论、迪基的体制理论，分析优缺点，在此基础上我们尝试用目的论的方法来探讨艺术定义问题。 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Emerging vanguard art in the 20th century has caused a difficult problem for the art definition, forming a protracted debate in the western aesthetic and literary theorists. Therefore, it is very necessary and urgent for the Chinese academics to systematically examine these theories. We make a comparative study of the new Wittgensteinism, Danto＇s ＂art world＂ theory, Dickie＇s institutional theory, and analyze its advantages and disadvantages. Based on these, we try erploring art definition by using a teleological approach. | |
| dc.language.iso | zh_CN | |
| dc.subject | 本质主义 | |
| dc.subject | 艺术界 | |
| dc.subject | 程序性 | |
| dc.subject | 审美目的 | |
| dc.subject | artistic object | |
| dc.title | 试析当代文艺理论界对于艺术定义的争论 | |
| dc.title.alternative | A brief analysis of the debate on the art def＇mition in contemporary aesthetic world | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
人文学院－已发表论文 [8328]
CH－Journal Paper