On the Standard of State Intervention Relating Guardianship Affairs under Child's Best Interest Principle
- 法学院－已发表论文 
儿童最大利益原则下监护事务的国家干预以司法干预为核心,发展方向从最小干预走向扩大干预,并趋于采用多元化的干预方式。司法干预的过程涉及到科学的评估,最大利益有以父母角度或者儿童角度考察者,而列清单的模式基于对相关构成要素与干扰要素的深入分析,对本原则进行司法化具有无可替代的优越性。以监护资格剥夺第一案为例,探讨儿童最大利益原则的司法适用问题,提出既需要遵守当前立法,也需要合理运用法官的自由裁量权。State intervention relating guardianship affairs under child's best interest principle regards judicial intervention as its core,which shows a trend from minimal intervention to expanding intervention combined with diversified methods. Scientific evaluation could be applied in the process of judicial intervention,that is,the best interest could be evaluated from the parents or children's perspective and be considered with factors list based on an in-depth analysis on relevant factors and interference factors. When it comes to the first case of deprivation of custody qualification,the adjudication of child's best interest should comply with currently legislation,and reasonably utilize the judges-discretion.