Interregional Service under Different Interregional Judicial Assistance Models in China
- 法学院－已发表论文 
我国的区际司法协助,内地与港澳采“安排模式”、大陆与台湾地区采“单向分别立法结合双向协议”模式。尽管模式不同,表面上的属性不同,内地与港澳、大陆与台湾的司法文书送达,主要依托公权力进行。不同模式下的送达规定互有异同、各有不足。“安排”和“双向协议”的共同特点是双边协商、分别执行,最高人民法院通过单方改进做法,制定司法解释以解决司法文书送达的困难,但也引发如何理顺协商与执行问题的思考。我国区际送达应利用多种途径,且进一步提高委托送达效率。Interregional judicial assistance in China has different models, Model between the mainland and the Hong Kong ＆ Macao, Legislation with Mutual Agreement Model across the Taiwan i. e. , Settlement One-way Separate Strait. Despite of different models and different surface attributes, both the service of judicial documents between mainland and Hong Kong ＆ Macao and the one across the Taiwan Strait mainly depend on public power. The provisions of service under different models have similarity and difference, advantages and disadvantages. The common characteristics of Settlement Model and Mutual Agreement Model are the bilateral consultation and separate enforcement. The Supreme People＇s Court copes st with the difficulties in service of judicial documents by unilaterally improving the method and enacting judicial interpretation. However, it invokes the consideration of how to coordinate the consultation and the enforcement. The interregional service in China should utilize different ways and further improve the efficiency of service by mandate.