Review and Perfection of Arbitration Procedure of Doping Cases in CAS： From the Perspective of the Establishment of ADD and Pechstein Case
- 法学院－已发表论文 
佩希施泰因案侵犯了平等、正确、迅速、经济等仲裁制度的基本价值目标,引发各界对CAS兴奋剂案件仲裁程序合理性的担忧。虽然,目前并无其他纷争解决方式能够予以替代,但对仲裁程序进行改革已成为共识。CAS新设反兴奋剂部门被视为兴奋剂仲裁程序改革之起点,当前有必要突破原有路径束缚,重新建构仲裁程序以平衡运动员与对方当事人的利益关系,通过富有针对性的修正路径倒逼CAS仲裁体系的根本性变革。认为应以平等、正确、经济为兴奋剂案件仲裁程序的总体价值架构,认采部分普世法原则,同时辅以妥适的制度设计。具体而言,在现有兴奋剂案件仲裁体系下,应强化平等理念,推进从规则的形式平等至裁决过程的实质平等;确立职权探知主义、协同主义,促进多方共同参与程序推进互动模式的形成,维护当事人有合理、公平参与及异议的权利;认采武器均等原则,完善程序扶助制度,在一定程度上使兴奋剂案件仲裁程序从形式平等转化为实质平等;落实仲裁平等权保障程序安定,满足当事人对于案件的结果控制性或期待可能性,以获裁决公信力。Pechstein Case violates the basic values of an equal,correct,rapid,economic and other arbitration system,raising concerns about the rationality ofthe proceedings of the CAS doping cases,although there is no other dispute resolution system that can be replaced,but there is consensus on the reform of the ar-bitration procedure for doping cases. The new anti-doping division of CAS has been regarded as the starting point for the reform of the doping procedure. It isnecessary to break through the original path and rebuild the arbitration procedure to balance the interests of the athletes and the other parties. This paper arguedthat the general value structure of the arbitral proceedings should be based on equality,correctness and economy,and some principles of universal law should beadopted,supplemented by proper system design. Specifically,under the existing doping arbitration system,the concept of equality should be strengthened to pro-mote the equality of the rules from the rules to the substantive equality of the ruling process. Establish the authority of the probe,synergy,promote multi-partyparticipation in the process of promoting the formation of interactive mode,to protect the parties have a reasonable,fair participation and objection. Establish theprinciple of equalization of weapons and perfect the system of subsidy to a certain extent so that the arbitration procedure of the doping case is transformed fromformal equality to substantive equality. Fully guarantee the stability of the proceedings,to meet the parties to the outcome of the case control or expect the possi-bility to be awarded the credibility of the ruling.