Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author郑剑顺
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T02:35:47Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T02:35:47Z
dc.date.issued2001-09-28
dc.identifier.citation厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,(03):141-147
dc.identifier.issn0438-0460
dc.identifier.otherXMDS200103019
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/152607
dc.description.abstract鸦片战争前 ,鸦片论议中的例禁论不是严禁论。严禁论中存在着“重治吸食”和“严惩兴贩”的分歧。以“重治吸食”、罪以死论禁烟 ,不应受到肯定 ;“严惩兴贩”、罪以死论才是合理合情的主张。以封关绝市杜绝鸦片来源的思想和决策是不合时宜的 ;而弛种土烟与弛禁论则同是想发毒品财。禁鸦片的关键在于打击鸦片贩卖 ,而不在于断绝对外开放通商。相反 ,大力发展对外贸易通商才是杜漏银、裕国计的良策
dc.description.abstractBefore the Opium War the banning of opium s moking and trade was not st rict. There were two different viewpoints in the strict banning. One was to puni sh the smokers severely, and the other was to punish the traders severely. It is clear that to sentence the traders to death was surely more reasonable than to sentence the smokes to death. It was not proper to try to ban opium trade by sto pping border trade. To loosen the ban and permit peasants to grow opium in China was aimed at reaping unfair profits. The key to opium banning was to forbid opi um trade, instead of banning foreign trade as a whole. To promote foreign trade was the best way to enrich the country.
dc.language.isozh_CN
dc.subject鸦片
dc.subject弛禁论
dc.subject例禁论
dc.subject严禁论
dc.subject封关绝市
dc.subjectopium, theory of slacken-the-banning, theor y of conventional banning. Theory of strict banning, stopping the foreign trade
dc.title鸦片战争前的鸦片论议新探
dc.title.alternativeOn the Opinions about Banning Opium before the Opium War
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record