Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author李毅
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T02:27:25Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T02:27:25Z
dc.date.issued2002-12-30
dc.identifier.citation南洋问题研究,2002,(04):17-24,98
dc.identifier.issn1003-9856
dc.identifier.otherLYWT200204002
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/150407
dc.description.abstract曾被归纳为东亚模式的东南亚三国与东北亚的台湾、韩国的工业化道路实际上存在很大差异,本文试图从历史条件、人力资源、政体与产业政策、外国直接投资与技术发展模式四个方面揭示这些不同类型的工业化产生的原因及发展轨迹,并讨论金融危机对其的影响。
dc.description.abstractThere are actually significant differences among the industrialization roads of the Southeast Asian-3 and Taiwan, South Korea in Northeast Asia which were once altogether classified as East Asian Model. This paper attempts to reveal the causes for emergence and the developmental tracks of these different industrializations from four aspects such as historical conditions, human resources, polity and industrial policies, foreign direct investment and technological development models, it also discusses the impacts of the financial crisis on them.
dc.language.isozh_CN
dc.subject东南亚
dc.subject东北亚
dc.subject工业化
dc.subjectSoutheast Asia
dc.subjectNortheast Asia
dc.subjectindustrialization.
dc.title东南亚和东北亚经济体工业化差异分析
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of the Differences of Industrializations Between Southeast and Northeast Asia
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record