• 中文
    • English
  • English 
    • 中文
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • 化学化工学院
  • 化学化工-已发表论文
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • 化学化工学院
  • 化学化工-已发表论文
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene over Mesoporous Alumina Supported Ni-Co Oxide Catalysts

Thumbnail
Full Text
Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene over Mesoporous Alumina Supported Ni-Co Oxide Catalysts.htm (402bytes)
Date
2012-09
Author
Sun Yi-Fei
Li Guang-Chao
Pan Xin-Di
Huang Chuan-Jing
Weng Wei-Zheng
Wan Hui-Lin
万惠霖
Collections
  • 化学化工-已发表论文 [14469]
Show full item record
Abstract
A series of mesoporous alumina supported nickel oxide, cobalt oxide, and bimetallic nickel-cobalt oxide catalysts were synthesized by a one-pot method, using nonionic triblock copolymer as a template and aluminum isopropoxide as the source of aluminum. For comparison, an additional supported Ni-Co oxide catalyst was prepared by impregnation, using mesoporous alumina as the support. The catalysts were tested for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane, and their structure and properties were characterized by N-2 adsorption-desorption, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed H-2 reduction (H-2-TFR), and laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS). All samples synthesized by the one-pot method had large surface area, highly ordered mesoporous structure, and highly dispersed supported oxide species. However, in the sample prepared by impregnation, the mesostructure of the carrier was destroyed with the formation of Co3O4 phase. Among the catalysts studied, the mesoporous alumina supported Ni-Co oxide catalyst from one-pot synthesis showed the best catalytic performance for propane oxidation to propylene. On this catalyst a 10.3% propylene yield was obtained at 450 degrees C, C3H8:O-2:N-2 molar ratio of 1:1:4, and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 10000 mL.h(-1).g(-1). This result was much higher than the yield of 2.4% obtained from the catalyst prepared by impregnation. Combining the results of characterization and catalytic reaction, the relationship between structure and performance of the catalysts was discussed. The large difference observed in catalytic performance between catalysts prepared by one-pot and impregnation methods was attributed to their different structures, including textural structure, and dispersion of the supported metal oxide species.
Citation
ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA,2012,28(9):2135-2140
URI
http://dx.doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206271
WOS:000308627200018
https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/14716

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

copyright © 2002-2016  Duraspace  Theme by @mire  厦门大学图书馆  
About | Policies