Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author郑振宇
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-14T01:02:17Z
dc.date.available2017-11-14T01:02:17Z
dc.date.issued2003-05-05
dc.identifier.citation国家行政学院学报,2003,(03):84-87
dc.identifier.issn1008-9314
dc.identifier.otherLJXZ200303021
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/137546
dc.description.abstract从西方政府的职能来看 ,西方公共决策可以分为常规决策和危机决策两大类 ,其中常规决策又可以分为行政决策和参与立法的决策两种。比较分析西方各国公共决策程序的特点 ,有两个方面的做法值得我们借鉴 :其一 ,注意发挥咨询机构的作用 ;其二 ,注意对政策方案的合法性审查
dc.description.abstractSeeing from working talent of western government, and the western government decision can be divided into two types, which are the normal decision and crisis of decision. Comparison characteristics of the western government decision and the decision of the participating and lawmaking, we can draw the conclusion as follows: one is the western countries have already developed the science of the decision procedure; two is that a process of western government decision is a process for continuously compromising.
dc.language.isozh_CN
dc.subject西方
dc.subject公共决策
dc.subject决策程序
dc.subject比较
dc.subjectWest
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectDecision procedure
dc.subjectComparison
dc.title西方公共决策程序比较
dc.title.alternativeProcedure Comparison of Western Government Decision
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record