ICSID仲裁撤销制度比较研究

Abstract

根据《华盛顿公约》 ,当事人对ICSID裁决不服的 ,可以援用撤销制度来请求撤销该裁决 ,故ICSID仲裁撤销制度专门维护东道国与外国投资者间的国际直接投资争端裁决的公正性 ,对当事人双方均极为重要。从比较法的观点来看 ,ICSID制度与《华盛顿公约》内的其他救济制度相比 ,“中心”仲裁撤销制度所针对的情况最为严重 ,所可能产生的结果最为严厉 ;比之于一般国际商事仲裁撤销制度 ,“中心”仲裁撤销制度的法律根据、撤销理由、撤销机构则较为统一 ,该制度的地位也较为重要

As a system specializing in safeguarding the fairness of arbitral awards on international direct investment disputes between host countries and investors,the annulment system of ICSID is very unique:compared with other remedies in Washington Convention,it is applied to more serious situations and possibly leads to more severe results;compared with annulment systems in common international commercial arbitration,it has the uniform legal basis,grounds on annulment and decision-organ,as well as important status.