The Protection on Female Must Be Based on the Value Orientation of Justice——on Influence of the Interpretation of the Marriage Law Judicial Interpretation (3)to Gender
- 法学研究 
【中文摘要】《婚姻法司法解释三》的颁布引起强烈的社会反响，突显了法律与性别、契约与情感的关系问题。争论围绕房产归属的规定展开的，争论的关键问题是财产分割中是否要给女性以特殊保护。一味强调同一平等与差异平等都有局限性。本文对《婚姻法司法解释三》的财产个人化的本质及其对女性可能产生的影响进行解读分析。财产个人化体现了法律的契约精神、是社会发展的必然趋势，财产个人化将对女性产生双重影响，从短期看不利于女性，但从长期看将对女性产生积极的作用。基于长期形成的女性的弱势地位，必须给女性以特殊保护，但必须基于客观公正的价值取向。 【Abstract】The publication of the Marriage Law Judicial Interpretation (3) causes a heat discussion in the society,which manifests the relationship between law and gender, contract and affection. The controversy is about a rule of house property ownership. A key problem of the controversy is whether to give the female special protection or not in the division of property. It has limitation in emphasizing merely same equality or different equality. In this thesis, it will interpret the essence of the property personalization in the Marriage Law Judicial Interpretation (3) and then to analyze some effects to the female in the marriage. Property personalization is an inevitable development in the society and it shows a kind of contractual spirit in the law. Property personalization has dual influence to the female. In the short term, it has more disadvantaged to the female while it will have more positive functions in the long run. Providing the female with special protection is necessary on the basis of their weak positions for a long time,nevertheless,an objective and impartial value orientation mutt be guaranteed.