Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author杨松
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T03:38:23Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T03:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citation科学技术哲学研究,2010,(2):31-35
dc.identifier.issn1674-7062
dc.identifier.otherKXBZ201002007
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/116122
dc.description.abstract自然主义伦理学内部有还原论与非还原论两个派别。以哈曼为代表的还原论和以斯德津为代表的非还原论展开了持久的争论,针对道德性质的解释力、道德副现象论等问题进行辩驳。这两个流派都是自然主义伦理学中极为重要的分支,因此对双方理论的探讨有利于深化学界自然主义伦理学的研究。
dc.description.abstractThere are two schools in ethical naturalism: reductionism and non-reductionism.As each side’s representative respectively,Harman and Sturgeon launched the lasting arguments which focus on moral property’s explanation strength,the moral epiphenomenalism and program explanation.These two schools are of great importance in ethical naturalism.So,it is useful for deepening the naturalism ethics research to explore their theories.
dc.language.isozh_CN
dc.subject还原论
dc.subject非还原论
dc.subject解释力
dc.subject道德副现象论
dc.subject程序性解释
dc.subjectreductionism
dc.subjectnon reductionism
dc.subjectexplanation strength
dc.subjectmoral epiphenomenalism
dc.subjectprogram explanation
dc.title伦理自然主义的还原论与非还原论之辩
dc.title.alternativeThe Debates Between Reductionism and Non-reductionism in Ethical Naturalism
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record